Before I begin, I will admit that I hate this growing trend to republish good books shortened, sanitised and ‘safe’ for children. The Power of One used to be read by young adults as well as old, but the young reader’s edition just makes some readers think they can read and absorb the whole thing in 300 pages. Or Mao’s Last Dancer is made non-confrontational for year 7 and 8. To my mind kids should wait until they can handle the contents of the original story, violence, sex and social confrontation included and then read the full story rather than reading weaker version of the same plot, and assuming there is nothing more in the original text. It’s like seeing the movie and skipping the book.
Having said that, you know I will not have liked this book. Garimara’s original story Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence is already short and accessible. A movie has been made of the highlights just to make sure everyone understands the achievement. The film is rated PG and I know several primary schools that show it in years 5 or 6. So why on earth did UQP feel they had to publish this very simple, short-cut version of the story?
The book is in large print, liberally illustrated and under 100 pages long. The whole stolen children event is covered in 2 pages with the line ‘I’ve come to take … [the girls] … to school down south’ and the mothers crying as they drive away as the critical events. The rest of the book is about escaping the school and the walk home.
If this was published to help children understand the stolen generation, it misses the mark badly. Going to school is something families face every day. Mothers cry every year as children head off for their first days of school. The power of the original story lies in the darker moments highlighting the brighter memories of home and thereby motivating the long walk.
Sorry, but I believe this book is a waste of resources.